send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Which of the following is not given by section 25 of Evidence Act
confessions made to custom officers
confession made to a member of Railway Protection Force
confession made to an officer under FERA
all the above.
- Option 1: Confessions made to customs officers are not admissible under Section 25 of the Evidence Act. Section 25 states that confessions made to police officers are inadmissible, and customs officers are considered to have similar authority in this context.
- Option 2: Confessions made to a member of the Railway Protection Force are also not admissible. They are considered law enforcement officers, paralleling the role of police officers.
- Option 3: Confessions made to an officer under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) are not admissible as evidence. Officers under FERA have enforcement roles similar to police.
Option 4: All the above statements are correct. Confessions to these officers fall under the criteria described in Section 25.
Answer: Option 4 - all the above
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses