send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Claim for necessaries supplied to a person incompetent to contract, from the property of such person. It is covered under concept of
Quasi contract
Caveat emptor
Contigent contract
Wagering agreement
- Option 1: Quasi contract
- These are obligations imposed by law to prevent unjust enrichment.
- Even if there is no actual contract, payment can be claimed for benefits conferred.
- Option 2: Caveat emptor
- Means "let the buyer beware."
- It is relevant in sales and speaks to the buyer's responsibility to assess quality before purchase.
- Option 3: Contingent contract
- These depend on future events happening or not happening.
- The obligation comes into effect only if the event occurs.
- Option 4: Wagering agreement
- These are based on uncertain events where the outcome is uncertain to both parties.
- Generally, they are not enforceable by law.
The correct answer is Option 1: Quasi contract . It applies to necessaries supplied to a person who cannot contract.
“”
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses