send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
An agreement which restrains a continuing partner of a firm from carrying on any business, other than the business of the firm, is
Void
Voidable
Valid
Unlawful
- According to the Indian Partnership Act, an agreement that restrains a continuing partner from carrying on any business, other than the business of the firm, while he remains a partner is considered valid.
- This restriction helps protect the interests of the firm and prevents conflicts of interest.
- Such restrictions are not against public policy, as they are connected to the business relationship in the partnership.
- Options explained:
- Option 1: Void — The agreement is not void, as it supports firm interests.
- Option 2: Voidable — It is not up to a party to void it; it is enforceable by law.
- Option 3: Valid — This is correct.
- Option 4: Unlawful — The law allows such agreements in partnerships.
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses