send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Mere nearness of relation does not necessarily imply natural love and ffection for making contracts without consideration is valid.
True
Partly True
False
None of the above
- Mere nearness of relation does not necessarily imply natural love and affection: This means that just being closely related doesn't guarantee genuine love or affection.
- Making contracts without consideration is valid: In contract law, consideration is typically required for a contract to be enforceable. Without it, a contract may not be valid.
Let's analyze the options:
- Option 1, True: Suggests both statements are entirely true, which is not correct because contracts usually need consideration.
- Option 2, Partly True: Implies some truth, but this doesn't fit since both need addressing accurately.
- Option 3, False: Accurately reflects that it's false to say that contracts without consideration are valid. Contracts usually need consideration to be valid.
- Option 4, None of the above: Means none are correct, which isn't the case here.
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses