send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Andy sues Brandy to recover certain property belonging to the estate of Candy, alleging that his father had been adopted by Candy’s brother, Danny to whom the property descended on Candy’s death. The suit is dismissed on the ground that the adoption is not proved. Andy then sues Brandy to recover the same property claiming it as Candy’s bandhu.
The suit is a case of res judicata. Andy ought to have claimed the property in the first suit in the alternative as Candy’s bandhu
The suit is a case of res judicata. Andy could not have claimed the property in the first suit in the alternative as Candy’s bandhu
The suit is barred as res judicata. Andy ought to have claimed the property in the first suit in the alternative as Candy’s bandhu
None of these
Report error
Access to prime resources