send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
In exceptional cases where is a chance of injustice to a litigant notwithstanding the procedure under O. 47, r 5 the review application can be placed before a judge or a bench of more than one judge as constituted by the Chief Justice, but it would be in conformity with the procedure and judicial discipline that:
O. 47, r 5 although ipso facto has no application in relation to writ proceeding or a proceeding on the original side of this court as well as in proceedings that arises on the appellate side, the procedure in principle in O. 47, r 5 should be followed
In case where merely one of the learned judges attached to the bench is available, he may issue rule that the matter on merit must be heard by a division bench of two judges or such number of judges as the Chief Justice may constitute
It would appear proper, even though the Chief Justice may have unfettered jurisdiction in the matter if constitution of benches including for a review application that the judge who is attached to the court and was a party to the judgment under the review is associated with the bench of two or such number of judges as the Chief Justice may constitute
All of these
Report error
Access to prime resources