send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Name of a party should not be allowed to be added by amending the plaint, where:
The suit is already barred by the limitation as against the party so proposed to be added
The omission to join him originally is not due to bona fide mistake
Either (A) or (B)
None of these
- Statement 1: If the suit is already time-barred as against the new party, courts generally do not permit adding them by amending the plaint. This prevents circumventing the Limitation Act.
- Statement 2: If the omission to add the party earlier was not a genuine or honest mistake, the court may refuse the amendment.
- Option 3: Covers both previous scenarios. So, if either the suit is time-barred or the omission wasn't bona fide, adding the party should not be allowed.
- Option 4: “None of these” is incorrect, since the above situations are valid legal grounds.
Correct Answer: Option 3 - Either (A) or (B).
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses