send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
An executing court can go behind the decree where:
the decree has been passed without jurisdiction – pecuniary, territorial or subject matter
the decree is a nullity having been passed against a dead person without bringing his legal representatives on the record
where the decree is ambiguous
all the above.
- Option 1: A court can indeed examine if a decree was passed without jurisdiction. If the court lacked jurisdiction—whether pecuniary, territorial, or subject matter—the decree is invalid.
- Option 2: If a decree was passed against a deceased person without involving legal representatives, it is a nullity. Courts can then revisit the decree.
- Option 3: Ambiguity in a decree lets the court interpret and examine it. However, going "behind a decree" typically involves more fundamental defects.
- Option 4: All the above scenarios justify going behind a decree, making option 4 the inclusive choice.
Correct Answer: Option 4 - all the above
.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses