send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
The words ‘just and convenient’ in O. 40, r 1 means:
That the court is to appoint a receiver simply because the court thinks it convenient
That the court should appoint a receiver for the protection of rights
That the court should appoint a receiver for the prevention of injury according to legal principles
Both (B) and (C)
- Option 1: This suggests appointing a receiver simply because it seems convenient to the court. This is overly simplistic and doesn't align with legal principles.
- Option 2: This means appointing a receiver to safeguard rights. It reflects that appointments should protect the interests involved.
- Option 3: This indicates appointing a receiver to prevent injury in compliance with legal principles, ensuring that rights are not harmed.
- Option 4: Combines both Options 2 and 3. It suggests that appointing should protect rights and prevent injury according to legal standards.
- Option 4 is correct as it encapsulates both safeguarding rights and preventing legal injury.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses