In a Kerala case Vincent v Aisumma which of the follow not ing propositions were laid down regarding...........

Civil Procedure Code (CPC) 1908 Appeals

In a Kerala case, Vincent v. Aisumma, which of the follow¬ing propositions were laid down regarding mandatory injunctions:

Under O. 39, r 1 a mandatory injunction can be applied for

An application can be made even by a defendant under O. 39, r 1 (a)

If such an application is dismissed, the order of dismissal is appealable under O. 43, r l(r)

All of these

छोटे Courses बड़े Results

Master Appeals

Prepare through Micro-courses

Try Now

Explanation:

- In the Kerala case, Vincent v. Aisumma, the following propositions were laid down about mandatory injunctions:

- Under Order 39, Rule 1(a), a mandatory injunction can indeed be applied for. This rule allows the court to grant temporary injunctions to prevent the ends of justice from being defeated, which can include mandatory injunctions.

- Even a defendant may make such an application under Order 39, Rule 1(a). It is not limited to just plaintiffs; defendants too can seek such relief if the situation demands.

- If a court dismisses such an application, the dismissal order is appealable under Order 43, Rule 1(r) CPC, which covers appeals against orders refusing injunctions.

- Correct Answer: Option 4 - All of these