send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Which of the following are instances of suits for a declaration and for possession of trust properly against third persons, that is, strangers to the trust?
I. A suit for the declaration that property belongs to wakf can be maintained by Mahommedan interested in the wakf without the sanction of the Advocate- General
II. A suit by the disciples of a mutt for a declaration that the defendant was not the duly appointed successor to the late head of the mutt, and that he was in posses¬sion under a false claim of title, and for evicting the defendant from the mutt properties
III. A suit for a declaration that a certain piece of land of which it was alleged that the defendants had taken wrongful possession was a public graveyard and for the eviction of the defendants from the land
IV. A suit to set aside an alienation of trust property alleged to have been wrongfully made by the trustees and for the recovery of property from the alienee
V. A suit by the trustees of a temple against the manager and treasurer of the temple for accounts and for a decree for what may be found due on taking such accounts
VI. A suit by the newly appointed trustees of an imambara for possession of the imambara against a former trustee who has been dismissed
I, II, IV
Ill, V, VI
II, V, VI
All of these
Let's analyze each statement:
- I. Concerns a suit for declaration regarding wakf property by a person interested in the wakf, not necessarily against a ‘stranger’ but still for declaration. However, the defendant may not always be a stranger.
- II. Disciples suing an illegitimate successor for declaration and possession—this is against someone who is a stranger to the rightful title.
- III. Suit for declaration and possession (eviction) against people in wrongful possession—these are strangers.
- IV. Suit for setting aside wrongful alienation and recovering property from alienee—a third party/stranger.
- V. Trustees suing a manager/treasurer for accounts—these are internal disputes, not against strangers.
- VI. New trustees suing a former trustee after dismissal for possession—also not against a ‘stranger’, as the former trustee was part of the trust.
Analyzing options:
- Option 1: Only I, II, IV—misses III, which is also against strangers.
- Option 2: Only III, V, VI—V and VI are internal disputes, not against strangers.
- Option 3: II, V, VI—again, V and VI are not against strangers.
- Option 4: All statements—this includes V and VI, which are not suits against third parties but internal disputes.
Most correct:
- Only II, III, IV are really “instances of suits for a declaration and for possession of trust property against third persons, that is, strangers to the trust”.
??
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses