In the case of Sir Srinivas Co. v. Firm VDHA Sethi an Andhra Pradesh case lays down which of the following propositions as regards interest for the post decretal period?

I. Where loan is a commercial transaction, even if there is no contract for payment of interest, interest can be allowed for the post-decretal period

II. In such a transaction, the proviso to s. 34 enables the court to award interest at the rate currently allowed by nationalised banks on deposits

III. But the claimant must adduce acceptable evidence as to the current rate so allowable by banks

IV. In the absence of such evidence, the court can allow reasonable rate of interest

V. In the particular case, award (by the trial court) of in¬terest at the rate of 12 percent per annum for the post- decretal period was held not to be wrong or incorrect