send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
A mortgages two properties X and Y to B. Subsequently by reason of the wrongful act of A, B is deprived of part of his security, namely property, Y. B thereupon sues A under s 68 of the Transfer of Property Act, and obtains a personal decree for the mortgage debt against A. In execution of the decree B applies for sale of property X. At this date B’s remedy on the mortgage had become barred by limitation.
The mortgage not being a subsisting mortgage (and A not having to redeem it), B, is not entitled to have property X sold in execution without bringing a regular suit for sale on the mortgage
The mortgage not being a subsisting mortgage (and A not having to redeem it), B, is entitled to have property X sold in execution without bringing a regular suit for sale on the mortgage
B. The mortgage not being a subsisting mortgage (and A not having to redeem it), B, is entitled to have property X sold in execution by bringing a regular suit for sale on the mortgage
None of these
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses