send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Please specify
Please verify your mobile number
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
A mortgages two properties X and Y to B. Subsequently by reason of the wrongful act of A, B is deprived of part of his security, namely property, Y. B thereupon sues A under s 68 of the Transfer of Property Act, and obtains a personal decree for the mortgage debt against A. In execution of the decree B applies for sale of property X. At this date B’s remedy on the mortgage had become barred by limitation.
The mortgage not being a subsisting mortgage (and A not having to redeem it), B, is not entitled to have property X sold in execution without bringing a regular suit for sale on the mortgage
The mortgage not being a subsisting mortgage (and A not having to redeem it), B, is entitled to have property X sold in execution without bringing a regular suit for sale on the mortgage
B. The mortgage not being a subsisting mortgage (and A not having to redeem it), B, is entitled to have property X sold in execution by bringing a regular suit for sale on the mortgage
None of these
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources