send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
A sues B for rent in kind for betel trees for the year 1897- 98 alleging that B was liable to pay. B applied for time to file a written statement which was refused. The only issue raised was as to amount of produce and the suit was decreed. Next year, A again sued B for rent in kind for 1898-99 and B pleaded that he was not liable to pay any rent.
Here, the question B’s liability for all years was alleged in the previous suit and was not therefore, directly and substantially in issue and that suit cannot barred by res judicata
Here, the question B’s liability for all years was not alleged in the previous suit and was therefore, directly and substantially in issue and that suit is barred by res judicata
Here, the question B’s liability for all years was not alleged in the previous suit and was not therefore, directly and substantially in issue and that suit is not barred by res judicata
None of these
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses