send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Kerala High Court has recognised the DECISIONAL AUTONOMY of a woman in a live-in relationship recognising the biological father of her child and the parental rights thereby flowing to him.
The married couple or unwed mother has to be understood in the backdrop of JUVENILE JUSTICE.
If a mother does not acknowledge any sort of relationship with the biological parent such mother has to be treated as an unmarried mother for the purpose of Juvenile Justice.
A woman becoming a mother in a rape or sexual assault, or accidentally , does not want to recognise or acknowledge biological father; in such circumstances, such mother has to be treated as an unmarried mother ."
A. YES, ATLEAST for the purpose of Juvenile Justice.
Q *. Whether or not the victim was capable of consenting to the sexual activity that resulted in her pregnancy will be addressed in the criminal proceedings before a trial court ?
A. SUCHITA SRIVASTAVA & Anr vs CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION on 28 August, 2009 SC
An FIR has already been filed in the said matter and two security-guards from Nari Niketan are being investigated for their role in the alleged rape.
Q. Whether the victim's pregnancy could be terminated even though she had expressed her willingness to bear a child
and
Q. Whether her `best interests' would be served by such termination ?
REVANASIDDAPPA & ANR VS MALLIKARJUN & Ors on 31 March, 2011 SC
Article 37 in the context of the duty of judiciary , Justice Mathew in Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru v. State of Kerala and another [(1973) 4 SCC 225] held:
"...... no incongruity in holding, when Article 37 says in its latter part "it shall be the duty of the State to apply these principles in making laws", that judicial process is `State action' and that the judiciary is bound to apply the Directive Principles in making its judgment."
By: Parveen Bansal ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses