send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Q. Whether Non-Explanation By Accused In Section 313 CrPC Statement Can Be Used As A Link To Complete Chain Of Circumstances?
A. NO
RELEVANT CASE LAW:
SHIVAJI CHINTAPPA PATIL V. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA LL 2021 SC 125]
OBSERVED THAT:
False explanation or non-explanation of the accused to the questions posed by the court under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, cannot be used as a link to complete the chain.
Q. Then what is its significance?
A. It can only be used as an additional circumstance, when the prosecution has proved the chain of circumstances leading to no other conclusion than the guilt of the accused.
By: IVY Justice League ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses