send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is appointed by the President
In consulation with the Judges of the supreme court and the High Court
Alone
In consulation with the Governor
In consulation with the Judges of the supreme court alone
Let’s break down the options about how the Chief Justice of India gets appointed:
- The President of India does appoint the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
- But it isn’t done *alone* (Option 2). The President must consult with judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts (that’s what the Constitution says).
- So, Option 1 (“in consultation with the Judges of the Supreme Court and the High Court”) is the correct one.
- Option 3 is off track—governors have no role in this appointment.
- Option 4 isn’t fully right either, because it leaves out the High Court judges, and the Constitution includes them too.
What this really means: The President can’t just pick whoever they want—they have to listen to the senior judges first.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses