send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Section 13 (1) and Section 18 (1) were held violative of which of the following article of the Constitution by the Madras High Court as they authorise the conferment of powers?
Article 12
Article 13
Article 14
Article 15
- Article 12: This describes "The State" for the purposes of enforcing fundamental rights. It includes the government and Parliament of India, and all local or other authorities within India’s territory.
- Article 13: Declares laws inconsistent with or in derogation of fundamental rights as void. It ensures that laws do not infringe on the fundamental rights of individuals.
- Article 14: Guarantees the right to equality before the law and the equal protection of laws within the territory of India. It prohibits arbitrary discrimination.
- Article 15: Prohibits discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth.
- The Madras High Court held Sections 13(1) and 18(1) as violative of Article 14, as they authorized the conferment of arbitrary powers, leading to potential discrimination.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses