send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following statement(s):
A police officer has the power to arrest any person without an order from a Magistrate or warrant of arrest, if he has reason to suspect his complicity in a cognizable offence punishable with imprisonment which may extend to seven years, provided that he is satisfied for reasons in writing that such arrest is necessary
(1) to prevent such person from committing any further offence.
(2) for proper investigation of the offence.
(3) to prevent such person from tampering with or causing the evidence of the offence to disappear.
(4) to compel the absconding co-accused to surrender.
Which of the statements given above are correct:
(1) and (2)
(2) and (3)
(1), (2) and (3)
(1), (2), (3) and (4).
- Police officers can arrest without a warrant if they suspect someone's involvement in a cognizable offense.
- Such cognizable offenses are punishable with imprisonment of up to seven years.
- Arrest must be justified in writing for certain reasons.
- Statement (1): Preventing the person from committing further offenses is a valid reason for arrest.
- Statement (2): Arresting for the proper investigation of the offense is also valid.
- Statement (3): Preventing evidence tampering is another valid reason.
- Statement (4): Compelling a co-accused to surrender is not a valid reason in this context.
- Option 3 includes statements (1), (2), and (3) and is correct.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses