In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that FIR was not substantive evidence and cou...........

Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1973 Investigation by the Police

In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that FIR was not substantive evidence and could only be used to corroborate its maker:

Union of India v. A. Kumar, AIR 2010 SC 2735.

C. Magesh v. State of Karnataka, AIR 2010 SC 2768.

Anil Kumar v. B. S. Neelakanta, AIR 2010 SC 2715.

Vijeta Gazra v. State, AIR 2010 SC 2712.

C. Magesh v. State of Karnataka, AIR 2010 SC 2768.

Submit Error