send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Akanksha is accused of disobeying a direction of the law with an intent to save Sonam from punishment. As per Section 213 Cr. P.C.
the charge must set out the disobedience charged
the charge must set out the law infringed
both (A) and (B)
none of them
- Option 1: The charge must set out the disobedience charged. The charge should explain the specific disobedience committed. This provides clarity on the actions that led to the accusation.
- Option 2: The charge must set out the law infringed. The charge should detail which law has been breached, giving a legal framework to the accusation.
- Option 3: Both (A) and (B). Including both the disobedience and the law infringed ensures thoroughness and clarity, offering a comprehensive understanding of the offense.
- Option 4: None of them. This suggests that neither the specifics of the disobedience nor the law need to be included, which could lead to ambiguity.
Correct Answer: Option 3 - both (A) and (B)
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses