send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Which of the following statements are true?
Under clause (a) of s.8, Specific Relief act, 1963, the onus is on the plaintiff to prove fiduciary relationship
Under clause (d) of s.8, Specific Relief act, 1963, the onus is on the plaintiff to prove wrongful transfer
The Explanation under s.8, Specific Relief act, 1963 deals with the onus under clause (b) and (c) which are placed upon the defendant, who has to prove that the compensation in money would be adequate relief and that it would not be extremely difficult to ascertain the actual damage caused by the loss of the movable property
All of these
Let’s break it down:
- Option 1: Under clause (a) of Section 8, Specific Relief Act, the plaintiff has to show there’s a fiduciary relationship to get back specific movable property. That’s legit—the onus is on the plaintiff.
- Option 2: Clause (d) deals with cases where the property was transferred in a wrongful way (like theft). Here too, the plaintiff has to prove there was a wrongful transfer. So, this one’s right.
- Option 3: The Explanation under Section 8 specifically covers clauses (b) and (c). It puts the burden on the defendant to prove that monetary compensation is enough and figuring out damages isn’t that tough. So, the explanation here is spot on.
- Option 4: So, if all the above are right, “All of these” is the answer.
So, you chose Option 4: All of these.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses