send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Abhijeet along with Balwinder and Charanjeet picks up a fight with Dheeraj. Abhijeet pulls out a gun on being provoked by Balwinder and Charanjeet to kill Dharinder who fires the shot at Dharminder but hits Ekram and causes his death. In this case:
Balwinder and Charanjeet can be convicted under Section 302, IPC read with Section 34, IPC
Abhijeet can be convicted under Section 302, IPC by the aid of Section 301, IPC
All the three accused can be convicted under Section 302, IPC by the aid of Section 301, IPC
Both (A) and (B)
- Option 1: Balwinder and Charanjeet can be convicted under Section 302, IPC read with Section 34, IPC, which deals with acts done by several persons in furtherance of a common intention. Their provocation could be seen as sharing a common intention with Abhijeet.
- Option 2: Abhijeet can be convicted under Section 302, IPC by the aid of Section 301, IPC, as he intended to kill Dharinder, but the bullet accidentally killed Ekram. Section 301 covers the principle of ‘transfer of malice’ where the intention to kill persists even if the person killed was unintended.
- Option 3: This option suggests all three can be convicted under Section 302 with the aid of Section 301. However, Balwinder and Charanjeet's roles don't align well with Section 301 as the accidental killing element involves Abhijeet's action directly.
- Option 4: Combining both interpretations, Abhijeet is liable under Section 301, and Balwinder and Charanjeet under 34.
Option 4 - Both (A) and (B) is correct.
“”
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses