send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
A, residing in Delhi beats B in Calcutta.
B may sue A in Calcutta
B may sue A in Delhi
Either (A) or (B)
None of these
- Option 1: B may sue A in Calcutta.
- This is valid because the incident occurred in Calcutta, giving B the jurisdiction to sue there.
- Option 2: B may sue A in Delhi.
- This is possible as A resides in Delhi, granting the Delhi court jurisdiction over A.
- Option 3: Either (A) or (B).
- This option is correct as both locations are valid for filing a lawsuit due to the location of the incident and the residency of the defendant.
- Correct Answer
- Option 4: None of these.
- This is incorrect because options 1 and 2 are valid.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses