send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
A case in Patna held that the language of Section 201, IPC is perfectly general and there is really no jurisdiction for holding that the offender cannot be punished for conceal¬ing evidence or causing of disappearance of evidence of the commission of the offence by himself. In which of the following this was upheld?
Maraj Alam v. State, 2008
State v. Anupam Das, 2008
Ram Kumari v. Rex, AIR 1949
State of Kerala v. Markose AIR 1962
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses