send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Under Order XXXII, Rule 9 of CPC, a ‘next friend’ of a minor can be removed:
if he ceases to reside in India during the pendency of the suit
where the interest of next friend becomes adverse to that of the minor
where the next friend does not do his duty
all the above
- Option 1: A 'next friend' of a minor can be removed if they cease to reside in India during the pendency of the suit. This is because their absence could hinder them from effectively representing the minor's interests.
- Option 2: If the interest of the 'next friend' becomes adverse to that of the minor, they can be removed. This ensures that any potential conflicts of interest do not compromise the minor's case.
- Option 3: When the 'next friend' does not do their duty, they can also be removed. The minor's interests need vigilant representation, and any lapse or neglect in duties is grounds for removal.
- Option 4: All the above. This option is correct as all the reasons listed in the other options are valid grounds for removal.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses