send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
G’s party was engaged in the peaceful pursuit of worship at their own takhat was busy attending to the Puja for the Nepali pilgrim. At that point of time they were not members of an unlawful assembly. It was the party of A who left their place and came to G’s takhat, presumably raising a dispute over the offerings made by the Nepali pilgrim. They came armed with deadly weapons and one of them inflicted a severe blow on the S and G’s side which resulted in his death and others received as many as 27 serious injuries.
G’s party exercise the right to self defence
Both G and A’s party cannot claim the right to self defence
A’s party had full intention of causing harm
Both (A) and (C)
- Option 1: G’s party exercise the right to self-defence
- G’s party was engaged in peaceful worship.
- A’s party arrived with weapons and attacked.
- G’s party had the right to defend themselves against the attack.
- Option 2: Both G and A’s party cannot claim the right to self-defence
- A’s party initiated the attack.
- G’s party was passive initially and then defended themselves.
- G’s party can claim self-defence, unlike A’s party.
- Option 3: A’s party had full intention of causing harm
- A’s party came armed with weapons.
- They inflicted a fatal injury and caused numerous other injuries.
- Indicates intent to harm.
- Option 4: Both (A) and (C)
- G’s party had the right to self-defence.
- A’s party intended to cause harm.
- Combines self-defence for G and malicious intent for A.
Correct Answer: Option 4 - Both (A) and (C)
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses