send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
‘Sedition’ as offence was held constitutionally valid in Kedar Nath v. State of Bihar, AIR 1962 SC 955 us dealt under-
Section 124 A of IPC
Section 128 of IPC
Section 136 of IPC
Section 138 of IPC
- Option 1: Section 124 A of IPC
- This section deals with sedition in India.
- It penalizes actions that incite hatred, contempt, or disaffection towards the government.
- Kedar Nath v. State of Bihar upheld this provision as constitutionally valid.
- Your choice aligns with this explanation.
- Option 2: Section 128 of IPC
- This section pertains to the act of public servant voluntarily allowing a prisoner of state or war to escape.
- Option 3: Section 136 of IPC
- This section deals with harboring a deserter.
- Option 4: Section 138 of IPC
- This section relates to abetment of an act of insubordination by a soldier, sailor, or airman.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses