send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
For a defence of intoxication, to escape criminal liability, the degeneration of mental faculties:
must be total
must be partial
both (a) & (b)
only (b) above is correct & (a) is incorrect.
- The defence of intoxication can limit criminal liability if the intoxication affects the mental state required for the crime.
- Option 1: Must be total - Intoxication needs to completely impair the ability to understand or control actions. This applies primarily to specific intent crimes.
- Option 2: Must be partial - This suggests that even partial impairment could be a defence, but it's less likely to be successful for serious crimes.
- Option 3: Both (a) & (b) - This implies either option could apply, though legal standards typically require total impairment.
- Option 4: Only (b) above is correct & (a) is incorrect - Focuses on partial impairment, which generally isn't sufficient for a defence.
The correct option is Option 1: Must be total.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses