Which one of the following cases does not relate to intoxication ........

Indian Penal Code (IPC) 1860 General Exceptions

Which one of the following cases does not relate to intoxication?

D.P.P. V/s Beard

Basudeo V/s State of Pepsu

R. V/s Mcnaughten

R. V/s Tandy

- Option 1: D.P.P. V/s Beard

- This case involves intoxication.

- Established that intoxication might be a defense if it prevented the defendant from forming a specific intent required for a crime.

- Option 2: Basudeo V/s State of Pepsu

- This case discusses intoxication under Indian law.

- It explains that voluntary intoxication does not excuse criminal behavior but might reduce its severity.

- Option 3: R. V/s Mcnaughten

- This case is not about intoxication.

- It is famous for establishing the McNaughton rules related to the defense of insanity.

- Correct Answer

- Option 4: R. V/s Tandy

- Involves a scenario where intoxication played a role.

- Deals with alcoholism and its impact on the ability to control actions.

Submit Error