send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
In which of the following means rea has been considered to be an essential element of an offence?
Srinivasmal Barolia V/s Emperor
R, V/s Tolson
Nathulal V/s State of Madhya Pradesh
In all of the above
- Srinivasmal Barolia V/s Emperor: This case deals with the importance of mens rea in the context of intent to defraud.
- R v. Tolson: In this case, mens rea is discussed in the context of mistake of fact and its influence on criminal liability.
- Nathulal V/s State of Madhya Pradesh: This case deals with mens rea being an essential element for proving criminal offense when the act was done under inadvertence or mistake.
- In all of the above: Mens rea is considered an essential element of an offense in all these cases, proving its significance in establishing criminal liability.
Your Answer:
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses