send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Which proviso of Section 92, Indian Evidence Act applies to cases where evidence is admitted to show that a contract is void, or voidable or subject to reformation, upon the ground of fraud, duress, illegality etc. in its inception?
Proviso (1)
Proviso (2)
Proviso (3)
Proviso (4)
Let's look at Section 92 of the Indian Evidence Act and its provisos:
- Proviso (1): This proviso permits the admission of evidence to show that a document is void or voidable. This could be due to reasons such as fraud, duress, or illegality in its inception.
- Correct Answer: Proviso (1)
- Proviso (2): Allows the introduction of oral evidence to show that the document was meant to be conditional. It considers scenarios where the operation of the document may depend on a condition not expressed in the document.
- Proviso (3): Admits evidence to clarify the meaning of illegible or ambiguous terms in the document.
- Proviso (4): Concerns evidence regarding the substitution of a valid document, particularly through oral testimony.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses