send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
In case of A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 was found conflicting with the two Articles:
Articles 14 and 17
Articles 19 and 21
Articles 23 and 25
Articles 23 and 32.
- Option 1: Articles 14 and 17
- Article 14 ensures equality before the law.
- Article 17 abolishes untouchability.
- Not primarily involved in the A.K. Gopalan case.
- Option 2: Articles 19 and 21
- Article 19 protects certain freedoms, such as speech and expression.
- Article 21 ensures protection of life and personal liberty.
- This is related to the case, as it deals with personal liberty under preventive detention.
- Correct Answer
- Option 3: Articles 23 and 25
- Article 23 prohibits human trafficking and forced labor.
- Article 25 assures freedom of religion.
- Not relevant to the A.K. Gopalan case.
- Option 4: Articles 23 and 32
- Article 32 provides remedies for enforcement of fundamental rights.
- Not relevant to the case's primary issue.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses