send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
The defence of ‘consent’ is restrictive in its applicability in cases involving:
alienable rights
inalienable rights
both (a) &(b)
neither (a) nor (b).
- Alienable rights: These are rights that can be transferred or waived by an individual. Consent can be a valid defense since the rights holder can choose to alienate or relinquish such rights.
- Inalienable rights: These rights cannot be surrendered or transferred, even with consent. Examples may include rights related to life, freedom, and dignity. The defense of consent is restrictive here because such rights are inherent and nontransferable.
- Both (a) & (b): Suggests consent could be restrictive in both contexts, but typically it specifically applies to inalienable rights.
- Neither (a) nor (b): Implies consent is not restrictive in any rights context, which is incorrect.
The correct answer is Option 2, inalienable rights.
“”
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses