send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
For a defence of intoxication, to escape criminal liability, the degeneration of mental faculties:
must be total
must be partial
both (a) & (b)
only (b) above is correct & (a) is incorrect.
- Option 1: Must be total
- This means the individual must have no capacity to understand their actions or know right from wrong due to intoxication.
- It's typically required for a complete defense in criminal law.
- Option 2: Must be partial
- Suggests that some comprehension or control is retained.
- Usually not sufficient for a defense in serious crimes.
- Option 3: Both (a) & (b)
- This is contradictory in context as (a) and (b) cannot both be correct.
- Option 4: Only (b) above is correct & (a) is incorrect
- Implies partial impairment is enough, which is generally not accepted in many jurisdictions.
- Correct Answer: Option 1: Must be total
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses