send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
If the sale and agreement to repurchase are embodied in separate documents then the transaction cannot be a mortgage This was laid down in
Chunchun Jha v Sheikh Ebadat Ali.
Beni Ram v Kundanlal.
Raja Kishandatt v Raja Mum/az Au.
Musahar Sahu v Hakimlal.
Equivalent citations: 1954 AIR 345, 1955 SCR 174
Headnote: In view of the provisions of the amended section 58(c) of the Transfer of Property Act, if the sale and agreement to repurchase are embodied in separate documents, then the transaction cannot be a mortgage whether the documents are contemporaneously executed or not.
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses