send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Mark the incorrect statement
Sec 53A furnishes a statutory defence to a person (transferee) who has no registered title-deed/or a valid instrument in his favour to maintain (or protect) his possession
Sec 53A creates no real right, but only a right of estoppel between parties
A transferee can be a plaintiff or a defendant, but his object must be to defend his right of possession, not to obtain it
The rights under Sec 53A can be used both as a shield as well as sword
Section 53A merely provides a right of defence, it can be used only as a shield not as a sword. The scope of this section is therefore ,limited because no right of action is available to transferee.
Leading case law dealing with the nature of rights of transferee: Prabodh Kumar Das v. Dantamara Tea Co. Ltd, The Privy Council held that in India the equity of part-performance was not an active equity. It does not give any right of action to the transferee who is in possession of property under an unregistered contract of sale.
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses