send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
The doctrine of 'Lis Pendens' was explained in the leading case
Tulk v Mo.hay.
Sheatfield v Strea (field
cooper v Cooper.
Bellamy v Sabine.
citation: 1 De G&J 566
The underlying principle governing the doctrine of lis pendens can be found in the judgment of Lord Justice Turner in the leading case of Bellamy V Sabine which says – “It is, as I think, a doctrine common to the courts of law and equity, and rests, as I apprehend, upon this foundation – that it would plainly be impossible that any action should or could be brought to a successful termination, if alienation pendente lite were permitted to prevail. The plaintiff would be liable in every case to be defeated by the defendant’s alienating before the judgement or decree, and would be driven to commence his proceedings de novo, subject again to be defeated by the same course of proceedings”.
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses