send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Mark the incorrect statement:
The principle of the rule contained in Sec. 41 is not the same as that of estoppel contained in Sec. 115,: -Evidence Act.
Sec. 41 is based on the. rule that no one can confer a higher right on property than what he himself possesses (Neino c/at qud non babel).
Sec. .41 is based on the principle of equity and natural justice.
Sec. 41 is based on the principle that where one of two innocent persons must suffer from the fraud of a third party, the loss should fall on him who has created, or could have prevented, the opportunity for the fraud.
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses