send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
'Rule against double possibilities' was recognized in which one of the, following cases?
Girjesh Dult v Daladin.
Whitby v Mitchell.
Ardeshir v Dadabhoy.
Sopher v Adminis'trator General of Bengal
- The 'Rule against double possibilities' is a legal doctrine stating that property cannot be left to vest in interest on the occurrence of two uncertain events in succession.
- Option 1: Girjesh Dutt v Daladin
Dealt with Hindu law and wills, not specifically about the rule against double possibilities.
- Option 2: Whitby v Mitchell
The leading case where the 'Rule against double possibilities' was firmly recognized. The case held that a remainder could not be limited to the unborn child of an unborn person.
Correct Answer
- Option 3: Ardeshir v Dadabhoy
An Indian case dealing with property law, but not specifically about double possibilities.
- Option 4: Sopher v Administrator General of Bengal
Involved questions of inheritance and succession, not the specific rule in question.
Correct Answer:
Option 2: Whitby v Mitchell
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses