send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
An acknowledgment must be one from which:
An absolute promise to pay can be inferred.
An unconditional promise to pay the specific debt can be inferred.
There must be a conditional promise to pay the debt and evidence that the condition has been performed.
All of the above,
All of the above
It was held in Jeevraj And Anr. vs Lalchand And Ors. AIR 1969 Raj 192 in Para 11 that While discussing the question, their Lordships referred to the following observations of Lord Justice Mellish in In re Rivers Steam Company, Mitchell's claim (1871) LR 6 Ch App 822:-- "An acknowledgment to take the case out of the Statute of Limitations, must be either one from which an absolute promise to pay can be inferred, or, secondly, an unconditional promise to pay the specific debt, or, thirdly, there must be a conditional promise to pay the debt, and evidence that the condition has been performed."
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses