send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Under Sec. 8:
The period can be extended up to an extent of 3 years, if under the ordinary law out of the period of limitation prescribed, there remains j a period of less than 3 years for bringing the suit
If under the ordinary, law out of the period of limitation prescribed, there remains a period of more than 3 years for bringing the suit, no extension can be granted and the plaintiff can avail of the ordinary period (though longer than 3 years).
Both (a) and (b).
Only. (a).
Let’s break this down:
- Option 1 says: If the regular law gives you less than 3 years left to sue, Section 8 can stretch that time up to 3 years.
- Option 2 says: If the regular law gives you more than 3 years, there's no extra extension—you just use that longer period.
- Option 3 is basically saying both the above points are true.
- Option 4 just repeats Option 1.
So, both situations (a) and (b) are correct and work together under Section 8. That means Option 3 is right—it covers what really happens under the law.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses