send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Which of the following is a sufficient cause within the meaning of Sec. 5:
Deliberate fraud of the counsel's clerk.
Amendment of decree.
Illness of pleader.
All of the above.
Let’s break it down:
- Deliberate fraud of the counsel’s clerk: Courts have recognized that if someone’s legal right is messed up because the counsel’s clerk committed fraud, it’s a big enough reason to condone delay under Sec. 5 (Limitation Act).
- Amendment of decree: If there’s been a change to a decree, it could justify a late appeal, since parties might not know what’s changed or need time to respond.
- Illness of pleader: If your lawyer is genuinely sick and couldn’t prepare or file things on time, courts take that seriously—people can’t be blamed for genuine illness.
Correct answer:
- Option 4: All of the above.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses