Which of the following is not a sufficient cause within the meaning of Sec 5 ........

Limitation Act (LA) 1963 Limitation of Suits etc

Which of the following is not a sufficient cause within the meaning of Sec. 5:

A bona fide mistake of fact on the part of the party.

Defective vakalatnama /inability to get • stamps

Ignorance of law.

All of the above.

- Option 1: A bona fide mistake of fact

- This can sometimes be a sufficient cause, as it may be a genuine error despite diligence and good faith.

- Option 2: Defective vakalatnama/inability to get stamps

- This might be considered a sufficient cause if it’s beyond a person's control and substantiated properly.

- Option 3: Ignorance of law

- Generally not considered a sufficient cause. The legal system assumes individuals should be aware of the law.

- Option 4: All of the above

- This suggests none of the options are sufficient causes, but Options 1 and 2 can be in specific situations.

Correct Answer:

- Option 3: Ignorance of law

Submit Error