send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
The question is, whether A committed a crime at Calcutta on a certain day. Applying Section 11, Indian Evidence Act which of the following facts can be relevant?
the fact that, on that day A was at Lahore
the fact that, near the time when the crime was committed, A was at a distance from the place where it was committed
either (A) or (B)
none of them
- Option 1: The fact that A was at Lahore on that day is relevant. This fact can show impossibility of A being present at Calcutta when the crime was committed.
- Option 2: The fact that A was at a distance around the time of the crime is relevant. It supports the claim that A could not have been at the crime scene, thus impacting the likelihood of A's presence at the crime scene.
- Option 3: Either (A) or (B) is relevant. Both facts can serve as relevant evidence to challenge A's presence at the crime scene.
- Option 4: None of them is incorrect. At least one fact is relevant per Section 11.
Your answer: Option 3
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses