Different persons are differently constituted and some persons when wanted in a criminal case deliberately abscond simply to avoid a criminal trial. Still, the flight of the accused from justice after the occurrence is a relevant circumstance indicative of the conduct of the accused. At the same time, it must be borne in the mind that conclusion of guilty mind cannot be drawn from such circumstances alone because even an innocent person may be tempted to such a conduct, to avoid arrest. This was observed by the Supreme Court in which of the following cases?