send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Which of the following is an exception to the provisions under Section 91, Indian Evidence Act?
When a public officer is required by law to be appointed in writing, and any officer has acted as such, the writing need not be proved
Wills admitted to probate in India may be proved by the probate
Both (A) and (B)
None of them
- Option 1: When a public officer is required by law to be appointed in writing, and any officer has acted as such, the writing need not be proved.
- This is an exception to Section 91, as the act of the officer can substitute the written appointment.
- Option 2: Wills admitted to probate in India may be proved by the probate.
- This is another exception, where the probate can serve as evidence instead of the original will.
- Option 3: Both (A) and (B)
- This option is correct because both situations are exceptions to the provisions of Section 91.
- Option 4: None of them
- Incorrect as both statements are valid exceptions.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses