send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
The rule that a judgment in personam is inadmissible against strangers is subject to the following exceptions in addition to those already mentioned:
I. When the judgement determines a question of public right and is admissible as evidence or reputation
II. In bankruptcy proceedings
III. In administration proceedings
IV. To an extent in patent action
I, III and IV
II and IV
I, II and IV
All of them
- A judgment in personam generally is not admissible against strangers, but there are exceptions.
- I. Public Right: When the judgment addresses a public right, it can be used as evidence of reputation.
- II. Bankruptcy Proceedings: Judgments here can affect strangers, particularly creditors or others with financial interest.
- III. Administration Proceedings: These handle deceased estates and may impact related parties.
- IV. Patent Action: Such judgments can limit others’ actions relating to intellectual property.
Option 4: All of them is correct.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses