Explanation:

Let’s break this down:

- Section 64 of the Indian Evidence Act talks about needing primary evidence to prove documents, and Section 65 lays down conditions for when secondary evidence can be given.

- Some sections of the Cr.P.C. make exceptions to these requirements, but not all.

Here's what each option means:

- Section 87(3), Cr.P.C.: This is about the service of summons by electronic communication. It doesn’t specifically say you can skip the rules of evidence in Sections 64 and 65.

- Section 88(3), Cr.P.C.: This section does *waive* the requirements of Evidence Act Sections 64 and 65 for summons sent by post.

- Section 89(3), Cr.P.C.: This also makes a special exception for service by courier, softening the need for strict evidence rules.

- Section 90(3), Cr.P.C.: Applies to the service of a warrant, and again eases the requirement to produce strict primary evidence.

So, Option 1 — Section 87(3) is correct here. All the others rule out the requirements of Sections 64 and 65, but Section 87(3) does not.

Option 1: Section 87(3) is the right answer.