A is accused of receiving stolen goods knowing them to be stolen It is proved that he was in possess...........

Indian Evidence Act (IEA) 1872 Relevancy of Facts

A is accused of receiving stolen goods knowing them to be stolen. It is proved that he was in possession of a particular stolen article. Applying Section 14, Indian Evidence Act, why, the fact that, at the same time, he was in possession of many other stolen articles is, relevant/ irrelevant?

It is relevant as, it tends to show that he knew each and all of the articles of which he was in possession to be stolen

It is not relevant as, it does not tend to show that he knew each and all of the articles of which he was in possession to be stolen

It is relevant as, it tends to show that he knew who stole the goods

None of them